Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC)
RESEARCH ETHICS
ACAP University College believes that all research should be conducted with honesty and integrity and follow responsible and ethical research practices. All ACAP University College students, staff and research partners engaged in research with ACAP University College are expected to adhere to the standards of ethical conduct prescribed in the e Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (ARC, 2018), as well as the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007; updated 2025), each developed jointly by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), the Australian Research Council (ARC) and Universities Australia.
Research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities should adhere to the principles outlined in Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and stakeholders (NHMRC, 2018), Keeping research on track II (NHMRC, 2018) and Ethical guidelines for research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (NHMRC, 2024), and the AIATSIS Code (2020; Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research.)
Research with victim survivors should adhere to the guidelines in An Australian Framework for ethical co-produced research and evaluations.
To differentiate what might constitute research and what might constitute a quality assurance activity, researchers are advised to check the NHMRC’s Ethical Considerations in Quality Assurance And Evaluation Activities (NHMRC, 2014).
RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN PARTICIPANTS
All research undertaken by ACAP University College students and staff that involves human participants requires ethics approval from the ACAP University College Human Research Ethics Committee (ACAP University College HREC, EC00447) before the research is commenced. Through this ethics approval process, research is assessed for quality, safety, privacy, risk management, financial management, and ethical acceptability in accord with the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research.
This process of ethical review and approval reassures researchers that their research project complies with the Code and National Statement and related statutory requirements and has moral validation as well as institutional backing. It also provides researchers with an opportunity to enhance the rigour and quality of their project.
Researchers of ACAP University College HREC approved human research projects are also required to submit a six-monthly progress report to the ACAP University College HREC.
Further information can be found under the relevant sections below.
ACAP UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HREC
Terms of Reference
Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) Operations Manual
HREC Chair
- Associate Professor Fiona Ann Papps
HREC Deputy Chair
- Dr. Larissa Clarkson
Research Experts
- Dr. Tatenda Manomano (Social Work)
- Professor John Reece (Psychological Science)
- Associate Professor Traill Dowie (Counselling)
Person with knowledge of, and current expertise in, professional care and treatment of people
- Ms. Belinda Jones
Person who performs a pastoral care role in a community
- Mr. Geoffrey Lienert
Lay Persons
- Dr. Christine Williams
- Rev. Dr. Peter Richards
Lawyer
- Ms. Ann Gibson
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
- Ms. Cathy Harris
Ex officio member – Associate Dean, Scholarship and Capability
- Ms. Gina Saliba
Ex officio member – acting Dean, acting Chair of ACAP Scholarship and Capability Committee
- Professor Helen Correia
ACAP UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HREC MEETING DATES 2026
January
No meeting
February
Document deadline: Wednesday, 11 February
Meeting date: Monday, 23 February
March
Document deadline: Wednesday, 11 March
Meeting date: Monday, 23 March
April
Document deadline: Wednesday, 15 April
Meeting date: Monday, 27 April
May
Document deadline: Wednesday, 13 May
Meeting date: Monday, 25 May
June
Document deadline: Wednesday, 10 June
Meeting date: Monday, 22 June
July
Document deadline: Wednesday, 15 July
Meeting date: Monday, 27 July
August
Document deadline: Wednesday, 12 August
Meeting date: Monday, 24 August 2025
September
Document deadline: Wednesday, 9 September
Meeting date: Monday, 28 September
October
Document deadline: Wednesday, 14 October
Meeting date: Monday, 26 October
November
Document deadline: Wednesday, 11 November
Meeting date: Monday, 23 November
December
Document deadline: Wednesday, 2 December
Meeting date: Monday, 14 December
Meeting time – 9:00am – 12:00pm (AEST/ADST)
PREPARING AN APPLICATION
- Guide to preparing an application
- Checklist for review of scientific merit and integrity (Staff research)
Templates:
- HREA Online Form
- Application Package: Quantitative and Experimental
- Application Package: Qualitative
- Application Package: Social Media Scrape and Secondary Data Analysis
completed samples:
Qualitative
Quantitative
REVISING AND AMENDING AN APPLICATION
REPORTING, MONITORING AND DATA MANAGEMENT
HREC ADVICE
HREC TRAINING
ACAP University college HREC Training Videos:
- Introduction to the research ethics training
- Module 1: Introducing research ethics
- Module 2: Practical issues in research ethics
- Module 3: Preparing your research ethics application
- Module 4: Preparing your HREA
- Module 5: Revising the HREA online
CONCERNS, COMPLAINTS, AND ADVERSE EVENTS
CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS
We take all allegations of code breach and misconduct seriously. The ACAP University College HREC is committed to ensuring that any person or organisation affected by its operations has the right to lodge a complaint and to have their concerns addressed in ways that ensure access and equity, fairness, accountability and transparency as per the National Statement on Ethical Conduct Chapter 5.6.
Any individual or organisation may initiate complaints about research involving human participants. These complaints may address:
- Research being conducted in a way which the complainant believes to be unethical or contrary to existing policy or legislation
- Research being conducted without formal HREC approval
- Research being conducted in a manner contrary to the conditions placed on the research in the letter of approval from the HREC
- Research being conducted in a manner contrary to an HREC application which has been approved
- Violation or compromise of confidentiality in recruitment, conduct and publication of research
- Misuse of data
- Any other similar matter.
To make a formal complaint about any aspect of a research project, please contact:
Associate Professor Fiona Ann Papps
Chair, ACAP University College HREC
ACAP University College
E: [email protected]
Researchers who wish to complain about any aspect of a research project – such as how it is being conducted or about the review of a project by the HREC – should also contact the Chair of the ACAP University College HREC.
All complaints are investigated according to the HREC Approved Research Projects Complaints and Appeals Procedures.
ADVERSE EVENTS
Adverse events should be reported to the HREC within seventy-two (72) hours of their occurrence or being identified, whichever is the sooner. In addition, any event that has an impact on the ethical acceptability of the study should be reported. The form below should be used for reporting adverse events and submitted to [email protected] once completed.
Download the Adverse Events form
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Making an application
All research involving human participants conducted by staff and students ACAP University College must undergo ethical review by the HREC prior to commencement of the research.
Due to the volume of applications received, and the short time frame for HREC members to review applications, HREC document submission deadlines cannot be overridden. Applications received after the document deadline will be held over to the next HREC meeting.
Currently, approximately 15% of applications are approved as submitted. There are a number of factors which can prevent your ethics application from being approved on initial review. One of the most common factors being inexperience by the researcher in submitting ethics applications. Students submitting an ethics application must have the application reviewed by their supervisor prior to submission to the HREC. Supervisors will have experience in completing HREA and an understanding of what is required by the HREC.
After you apply
Once your application has been reviewed, the minutes of the meeting are compiled for approval by the HREC Chair. The feedback from the meeting is then sent in a Notice of Outcome via email to the applicant and supervisor.
The Notice of Outcome will list the changes that need to be made or the additional information that is required. Where the Committee says ‘for noting’, this is not something that must be changed but should be acknowledged by the applicant.
On return of the revised HREA the application will then follow one of two courses of action as indicated on the ethics notice. These consist of the following:
1. Full review by HREC;
2. Review by Chair.
You will be notified of the outcome of your revised application within 7 business days of receipt by the HREC Secretary.
It is uncommon for an application to be rejected by the HREC. If the applicant disagrees with the feedback of the HREC the applicant will need to submit information in an email to the HREC Secretary addressing why the applicant disagrees with the feedback. This will be assessed by the HREC Chair for review and determination.
To request approval for changes to approved research or an extension of time, an email outlining the request/changes needs to be sent to the HREC Secretary. If there are any ethical implications that arise due to the change, this will need to be addressed in the email, and updated information sheets and consent forms submitted if necessary.
Yes. In accordance with Section 5.5.5 of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct on Human Research (2007), progress reports on approved research must be submitted at least annually.
The ethics approval notice will advise the date that you need to submit your progress report. Progress reports are to be emailed to the HREC Secretary and should be completed using the progress report template.